My book group discusses Kristin Hannah’s The Nightingale and what it means to be a discerning reader
Last fall, my group enthusiastically endorsed starting
the new year with The Nightingale,
the runaway best seller that has garnered 16,521 reviews on amazon.com, 85% of
which are 5 stars. A couple of
weeks before our January meeting date, the emails and texts began flying
around: “Very predictable;” “Beach
book genre;” “72% done. Getting tedious.” By the time the group met, most of us
had finished and liked it a bit better.
Personally, I thought the last 1/3 redeemed the first 2/3 as the
characters began to face moral dilemmas for which the right choice was not
obvious, and this made it more interesting, but still, I would give the book no
more than 3 stars. Had we not read
All the Light We Cannot See, set in
the same time period and similar location, perhaps we would not have been such
harsh critics. The Doerr book is
layered and sophisticated with beautiful language and imagery. The Hannah book, by contrast, is fairly
straightforward, telling rather than showing, and contains few surprises. (I’m sure Kristin Hannah is laughing
all the way to the bank.)
One group member said she was embarrassed to have
recommended the book based on the encouragement of two other friends whom she
said, “I thought were discerning
readers!” What does that mean,
exactly? Are the 14,000+ reviewers
on amazon who LOVED (their caps) this novel less than discerning readers? We wondered. Are we book snobs?
My book group consists entirely of teachers, some practicing, some
retired and with one exception, people with degrees in English. Perhaps our eye for books is different
because our business is the richness of language and the craft of
narrative. Thus, I think we read
with different expectations, always on the lookout for a novel that is worthy
to teach. Can it be a great book
if it isn’t something you’d put in the curriculum? There are certainly books that I would not teach that are
well written – I am currently reading Elizabeth George’s Banquet of Consequences, an excellent mystery with continuing
characters who have been carefully crafted over the series – but its subject
matter doesn’t lend itself to the classroom. While the topics and issues of The Nightingale do very much belong in any literature study, the
issues are not nuanced or developed in a way that warrants close reading and
analysis.
The group concluded that yes, we are, in fact, more
discerning readers than many. I
recognize, however, that it is a continuum. My husband’s book group (also teachers) reads Tolstoy and
Doestoevsky in 200 page increments – heavy lifters by comparison. Still, in an age with the prevalence of
social media and with television and movies on demand, it’s great that those thousands
of people are picking up a book and reading it.
Recommendations from (discerning!) friends of other WW2 era books:
SUITE FRANCAISE-Irene
Nemirovsky
SARAH’S KEY-Tatiana de
Rosnay
A TRAIN IN WINTER Caroline
Moorehead
LOVERS AT THE CHAMELEON
CLUB, PARIS 1932, Francine Prose
No comments:
Post a Comment